The pair shares many names, but the smaller weight in each common position limits the portfolio intersection to about one-eighth of assets.
Monopoly MOAT Research Desk FREE TOOL
ETF overlap calculator
ETF Overlap X-Ray
Compare how much MPLY, MOAT, and TOLL share by portfolio weight, using dated issuer holdings rather than a simple ticker count.
Reviewed by Monopoly MOAT · August 26, 2026 · Sources and dates are listed below
CHOOSE TWO FUNDS
See shared holdings by weight.
Choose a dated pair. We show the shared exposure without republishing the issuers’ raw holdings files.
Nearly half of TOLL sits in names also found in MPLY, but those names are usually much smaller inside MPLY—so weighted overlap is only 10.87%.
Only five securities intersect. Semiconductor exposure contributes most of the shared weight, with AVGO and AMAT appearing in all three funds.
Primary evidence: MPLY · Aug 25 MOAT · Aug 24 TOLL · Aug 21
FORMULA
The smaller weight is what really overlaps.
weighted overlap= Σ min(wA,i, wB,i)
Why not just count tickers? A 0.10% position and a 10% position count equally in a name match but do not create equal exposure.
Matching. Cash is excluded. MPLY–TOLL uses CUSIP matching where available; pairs involving MOAT use normalized tickers.
Not synchronized. The issuer dates differ by up to four calendar days. Holdings can change after those dates.
TOLL source caveat. Tema's page reports 40 holdings, while its August 21 download has 39 rows including cash—38 securities. This release preserves the discrepancy.
3.31% minimum-weight overlap across all three dated portfolios.
WHAT THIS PAGE SHOWS
Useful results, with the source limits visible.
This rights-conscious first release publishes derived pair metrics and the method; it is not a legal conclusion about data rights. A local portfolio-upload version remains deferred until holdings-display and identifier rights are cleared. Your portfolio should never have to leave your device for an overlap calculation.
DOWNLOAD THE PDF
Download the workbook.
An eight-page overlap workbook with pair receipts, formulas, asymmetric-exposure checks, diligence prompts, and a source log.
- Printable US-Letter edition
- Definitions, sources, and dates included
- No recommendation, rating, or sponsored placement
Your PDF is ready.
Your email was recorded. Your download is available for 15 minutes. If it expires, reload this page and submit the form again.
Download the PDFCOMMON QUESTIONS
Questions readers usually ask.
How much do MPLY and MOAT overlap?
Using issuer holdings dated August 25, 2026 for MPLY and August 24, 2026 for MOAT, 16 securities are shared and weighted overlap is approximately 11.66%. The figure is a Monopoly MOAT calculation: the smaller portfolio weight is summed for every shared security, with cash excluded.
How is weighted ETF overlap calculated?
For each security held by both funds, take the smaller of its two portfolio weights and add those minimum weights. This portfolio-intersection measure is more informative than counting matching ticker symbols alone.
Which stocks appear in MPLY, MOAT, and TOLL?
AVGO, AMAT, and FTNT appear in all three dated issuer snapshots used here. Their three-way minimum-weight overlap is approximately 3.31%.
Is ETF overlap necessarily bad?
No. Overlap describes shared exposure; it does not decide whether that exposure is suitable. Investors still need to assess mandate, valuation, concentration, fees, taxes, liquidity, and their own portfolio.
SOURCES AND DATES
Check the sources behind the result.
Each figure keeps its source date. Unknowns and derived calculations are labelled rather than filled in.
- 01MPLY holdings CSVStrategy Shares · Aug 25, 2026
- 02MOAT daily holdings downloadVanEck · Aug 24, 2026
- 03TOLL holdings CSVTema · Aug 21, 2026
- 04MethodologyMonopoly MOAT